FARHAD REZAEI

Although the full extent of the damage is not yet known, it is quite clear that the regime’s efforts to develop nuclear weapons and delivery systems have been significantly set back.

Hamas leader Sinwar’s death marks the beginning of the end of Iran’s ‘unity of fronts’ strategy against Israel.

Despite Hezbollah's critical role as Iran's regional proxy, Tehran remains hesitant to intervene as Israel cripples the group—economic, political, and strategic factors explain why.

As Iranian threats against US officials intensify, sanctioning Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, has become essential in safeguarding American security and deterring further aggression.

At this juncture, playing into the regime’s game could only enable Iran to breakout with an actual bomb, an outcome no Western country should desire.

Israel faces escalating Hezbollah attacks but must delay major military action due to multiple fronts and US distractions, focusing instead on countering Iran's nuclear threat until January 2025.

To deter future Israeli attacks, Iran would need to retaliate directly against Israel. However, such action could provoke a severe response from the IDF.

For Israel, this marks a critical moment to assess the broader consequences of these actions and the apparent reluctance of the Iranian regime to escalate tensions by assigning blame.

Western analysts and policymakers, perpetuated the charade that the terror groups are somehow independent decision–makers by their willing suspension of disbelief. 

The fruit of Tehran’s strategy is evident in the recently announced US plan to pull all its remaining troops from Iraq.