After 14 months of combat on Israel’s borders, no “ceasefire” actually exists, contrary to almost every news report in the world. As pundits cover the complexities of the Middle East, news agencies interpret a lull in hostilities as an “armistice” or a “ceasefire,” which brings to mind the armistice that led to the end of hostilities in World War I. The war terminated on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month (November 11, 1918), paving the way to the Versailles Peace Treaty and the genesis of the League of Nations.

However, the world of journalism and diplomacy ignores the clearly enunciated message conveyed in Arabic in Arab media: That the Israel-Hezbollah “ceasefire” announced is no more than a hudna (a pause intended only for rearmament), or a tahdiya (a temporary halt in hostile activity which can be violated at any time), or at best a hudaybiyyah (no fighting for 10 years, named after the Treaty of al-Hudaybiyyah in 628 CE), and certainly not a sulh – the Arabic expression for a cessation of hostile activity ahead of making peace and reconciliation with an enemy.

The authoritative Islamic Encyclopedia (published in London in 1922) defines hudna as a “temporary treaty” which can be approved or abrogated by Islamic religious leaders, depending on whether or not it serves the interests of Islam; a hudna cannot last for more than 10 years.

Read More